Video Preferences View Next Video

Panel Discussion on Bankruptcy and Poverty  
  Women Without Money Introduction 1:57
  Welfare to Work 12:54
Consequences of Welfare Reform 23:51
  Middle Class Women and Bankruptcy 22:20
  Audience Question and Answer 15:29
Panel Discussion on Women as Commodities  
  Women as Commodities Introduction 4:54
  Surrogate Motherhood 19:16
  Sex Workers 14:59
  The Genteel Marriage Market 19:51
  Interaction Among Panelists 18:01
  Audience Question and Answer 8:56

Consequences of Welfare Reform
  Embedding himself into Philadelphia's inner city in search of the consequences of the 1996 welfare responsibility act, Elijah Anderson, Charles and William L. Day Distinguished Professor of the Social Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania, gives a realistic, insider's view of inner-city life and economy.

In trying to contextualize welfare reform, Professor Anderson traces America's shift from a manufacturing and service-based economy to a workforce led by trained, high-tech labor. The resulting loss of low-paying jobs, coupled with welfare reform, has essentially cut off money to inner-city families.

To grasp a realistic view of the inner-city economy, says Professor Anderson, you must "follow the money." The inner-city economy "rests on three props: low wage jobs, welfare payments..., and the idiosyncratic, irregular underground economy based on drug dealing, street crime, bartering, begging, sharing, [and] exchange.... Cut off any one of these, and you put pressure on the other two...." He continues, "Distress is visited on these communities by policies made by people who often know nothing about them."